Jon Loeb ’11 & Cole Manley ’11
Staff Writer & Senior Writer
If you have glanced at the front cover of a New York Times issue in the past several weeks, or watched any news coverage, you will have likely seen countless pictures of oil spewing out into the Gulf of Mexico and coating innocent pelicans.
In the past month, millions of barrels of oil have steadily formed an ever-expanding slick hundreds of miles wide, covering gulf beaches and estuaries in the process.
Whom to blame? Of course, BP deserves accusation. But more fundamentally, our nation’s centuries-long addiction to oil, and other fossil fuels, is the culprit.
Even more damaging is the effect these fossil fuels are having on the Earth’s atmosphere.
The merits of climate change can no longer be questioned. Global warming is not a myth; rather, studies by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s third and fourth assessments predict additional warming of 2.5-10.4 degrees Fahrenheit in the next century. Already, glaciers in the Alps, Himalayas, and mountain ranges across the world have melted at previously unseen levels. The evidence is irrefutable.
And on a purely pragmatic level, the continued overuse of fossil fuels is shortsighted. Oil reserves will last at most 80 more years, with coal completely depleted by 2400. Yet many devices that we depend on, such as cars, still rely on these limited fuels.
Something has to change.
What will power the future, while also helping the planet? What energy source can act as a ubiquitous, clean solution to the energy and climate change crises simultaneously?
The answer, as Bob Dylan would sing, is “blowin’ in the wind.”
Wind energy, when coupled with other “green” energy sources, can act as the green panacea.
Unlike oil or coal, wind is renewable, and will constantly be generated from the uneven heating of the Earth’s surface. As the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) writes, “wind will continually be produced as long as the sun shines on Earth.”
But the positives of wind energy extend far beyond constancy.
Unlike other renewable energy sources, like geothermal energy or solar power, wind energy is widely available, especially in the United States.
According to one report by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, based on a minimum wind speed requirement of fourteen miles per hour, wind energy extraction is profitable in 37 states.
In fact, as of 2009, 36 states had installed wind energy projects; Connecticut was one of just fourteen states not to have a single wind energy site.
Perhaps the largest reason for wind energy is its lack of carbon dioxide emissions – greenhouse gases replete in oil and coal refinement which are a major cause of global warming.
Silently, wind turbines spin through the air, turning blades, powering an internal generator and then transferring this electricity by tower and cable to homes or businesses. Gone are the columns of smoke and particles billowing up from coal plant or oil refinery.
Additionally, wind technology has improved exponentially in recent years, with new and more powerful wind farms sprouting up in Texas and along the western and eastern coasts. Currently the largest wind farms can produce enough energy for 250,000 homes.
Unlike solar power, wind power works for 75% of the day. An inherent disadvantage of solar power is that it can only generate electricity during the daytime.
Furthermore, hydropower dams, another heralded renewable option, are very expensive to construct, and often flood agricultural land and environments behind the dam.
So how does wind energy relate to Westport?
Offshore wind farms, while criticized for visual and noise pollution, are becoming more and more feasible, especially along the Eastern seaboard.
Next to Cape Cod, on the Nantucket shoal, 130 wind turbines are expected to power most of the Cape’s electrical needs.
We should follow this approach.
In a hundred years, or even forty, do we want to face severe energy shortages, brought on by our own inaction? Or do we want to celebrate the speedy expansion of wind energy, as oil reserves dwindle and coal mining slows?
Alternative Energy News • May 26, 2011 at 2:38 pm
We are trying to help promote green energy, if you or anyone at your school has any original content, please contact our site. Thank you.
Rick • Sep 3, 2010 at 10:37 pm
It seems nobody thinks about all of these technologies having to power up the grid that leaks 10% due to radiation (60hz wavelength is 1800 miles, the wires act as an antenna), resistance, transformers. Check out Windtronics. Why help big business (GE, Mega utilities whose business is to sell you power) when a wind capturing device is at your house or business. Housetop solar, wind, solar hot water near the point of use is the most green thing and overall the lowest cost for a household. Texas is going to spend 5 billion to put wires up to transfer power from wind turbines to some cities. 20-30% of the power will be lost going to the point of use. Great deal for the customer because they don’t need a great rate of return for all this expense. My solar hot water system makes me use hot water differently but I don’t pay for hot water anymore. $5 billion would buy 900,000 3kw turbines that would produce electricity for 20 years, employee ordinary people to put them up. Instead of GE and a few top people getting funding from tax payers and then putting it on our electric bill!
Carmine Cifaldi • Jun 18, 2010 at 5:01 pm
Electricity, generated by “Wind Farms”, situated in the atmosphere, will be the renewable-energy source for the future! An extremely important reason, is because of the “double-quadruple principle”. (As you double the wind-speed, and/or you double the diameter of the blades, you quadruple the amount of electricity which may be produced. a combination of the two, will increase the amount of electricity 16 times). Wind-generators stationed in the atmosphere. [much like a kite in a strong wind], have 3 things going for them! 1). The wind blows 24 hours per day, every day. 2). Wind velocities at the high altitude, may reach as high as 200 MPH. 3). Being situated well-above the clouds, ancillary solar-cells may provide maneuvering capabilities to assure position and stability.
s thompson • Jun 13, 2010 at 5:18 pm
I would like to see our federal government award grants to our local public schools giving school districts the funds to purchase wind energy. The school district would then use the money generated by selling the wind energy (collected by the school districts wind farm) to the local power utility/grid. This green, renewable wind energy revenue would then go back into the coffers to fund our public schools. Local property taxes have never been a good choice to fund schools. School funding has been a problem for the last century, with heavily taxed districts having better schools and poor school districts not having enough funds. All public schools across our country could produce green renewable wind energy and then recycle the funds of the wind/solar energy into their respective school district(s)! We can do this!!! We can change the way we fund our public schools with green renewable energy to educate the next generation of Americans and help get us off oil! We would all be better off having wind farms on our shores than BP oil spills… Go Green, Go America! Sharon