Joy Eisenberg ’10
Sports Editor
Rachel Upton ’10, an avid rower for the past five years, remembers a time when she saw a coach cut off a lightweight rower’s ponytail because she was almost a half–pound over the weight category’s maximum. “It was two hours before the race and she had to be weighed in for finals at nationals,” Upton said. “Instead of having her do a sweat run, the coach just cut off her ponytail.”
Upton’s story is just one example of the extremes athletes and sports teams will go to when competing.
Weight categories have been employed for centuries as a means of balancing competition in an array of various sports. However, only in the past couple of decades have the methods used by the athletes for meeting these weight–oriented goals been evaluated.
In sports where the size and physical strength of the athletes are known to be vital to an athlete’s success, the physically superior combatants are more likely to have an advantage over the smaller competitors. Therefore, weight categories have become essential to competition in sports.
Such pressure to be a certain size has led some athletes to do whatever it takes to make that category, even if it means going to the extremes or putting their health in jeopardy. Techniques such as sweating, diuretics, fluid and food restrictions the day before a meet are shared among athletes in the world of competition.
In 1997, the tragic deaths of three wrestlers made news and initiated a much-needed discussion on the techniques used by athletes to “make weight.” One of the wrestlers, Jeff Reese, attempted to qualify for a lower weight-class by working out in a rubber suit in severe temperatures, and consequently died due to kidney and heart failure.
Today’s athletes commonly use similar methods.
“During my sophomore year, we brought a lightweight boat to Nationals. One girl on the team was one pound over the limit and was forced to go on sweat runs… in order to lose some water weight in time,” Upton said.
Upton explained that in both men’s and women’s rowing there are two categories: lightweight and open-weight, where “open-weight is the nicer term for heavyweight,” Upton said.
“Every person in the race has to be weighed in two hours before the race. If a person doesn’t make it [the weight category], they can’t compete,” Upton said.
In sports where there are weight divisions, such as rowing, wrestling, and gymnastics, it is important to compete in the field that is healthiest for the combatant. However, athletes and coaches are trying to squeeze themselves or others in categories where they don’t belong, breaking the so-called system of equality.
Henry Betar ’12, a member of the Staples wrestling team, has seen similar methods of maneuvering around the regulations.
“A lot of people try to go up or down [in weight] so they can be at the top of the class,” Betar said.
In high school wrestling, there are 14 weight classes set by the National Federation of State High School Associations. The classes range from 103 pounds to the heavyweight category of up to 285 pounds.
“If you were wrestling without a weight class system it would be unfair and probably dangerous,” Betar said.
Although many athletes find themselves with different eating habits during the sport’s season, such as eating less or more in order to make the necessary weight, neither Upton nor Betar has expressed experience in needing to change their ways in order to meet the scale.
“I really don’t have to watch what I eat too much,” Betar said. “The practices we have are really good in keeping us fit.” Upton agrees, “I’m a vegetarian so I usually eat pretty healthy, [and] we are monitored by our coaches to keep us on track. It’s really strict.”
Despite the health problems weight categories implement, there are some benefits.
“For the sport itself there is definitely a benefit [to weight categories]. Rowing is weight based, where the more mass someone has the better. The categories allow smaller girls to compete,” Upton said.
M.S. • Jan 30, 2010 at 11:25 am
I may not be able to keep this brief and stress how strongly I feel about this issue but I would like to remind the readers that the responsibility for the safety of the athlete and the fairness of the sport rests on the coaches, institutions, and sports governing body. These weights classes are important to maintain but need better monitoring and greater responsibility to be taken for the adults in charge. No event or championship is worth winning at the expense of endangering the health or lives of your athletes. There are better ways to handle weight-based sports than to last minute or unhealthy measures. There are safe practices and standards that are disregarded so that extreme measures need not be taken for high school and college student-athletes to put themselves in the position to sweat weight, starve or endanger themselves. When athletes are sweating all their fluids out they are also micturate calcium from their bones which causes problems in later years. Currently in the sport of rowing, unlike wrestling, the practices are not monitored well enough by the governing body. The fairness issue has been debated within the context of ethics but there are still many persons searching to feed their egos for a win in trade for taking the extra time to set up a safe, fair system for their athletes to compete, AND DON’T EVEN GET ME STARTED ON THE ELITE LEVEL ATHLETES, your high school or college team is not to be compared or justified by this standard.